16 comments

  • pyrophane 44 minutes ago
    GrapheneOS actually recommends against using Aurora and instead just using the Play Store, so this shouldn't really hurt users.

    For extra privacy, you can sign into the Play Store with a Google Account that isn't tied to anything else.

    • hadlock 2 minutes ago
      It seems wise to have at least one alternative mobile phone app store. Even if it isn't very good. If the government can tell Google to do trivial things like, for example, change the name of bodies (plural now) of water, it can turn off your app updates, trapping you on insecure versions indefinitely. This probably matters more if you live outside of the US, but if I had a plan B for an app store on my phone, I would certainly at least evaluate it.
    • DaSHacka 33 minutes ago
      Although the nice thing about Aurora Store is it allows you to install apps without a google account linked to your device, keeping Google Play Services signed-out.

      Somewhere in the FAQ GOS advertises that Play Services can be used without signing in, but they also recommend the official Play Store (which requires signing in) and explicitly don't recommend Aurora (which doesn't).

      Unless I'm missing something, I don't see how you can functionally use Play Services signed-out when in order to obtain those apps in the first place, you need to sign into a Google Account for Google Play.

      That's personally what I used Aurora for, plus as an easy way to export APK files.

    • joekrill 28 minutes ago
      > a Google Account that isn't tied to anything else.

      Isn't that pretty much impossible? You need a phone number for verification, which effectively ties it to that phone number.

      • armadyl 21 minutes ago
        Accounts created on stock Pixels don’t require phone numbers.
        • iririririr 18 minutes ago
          that haven't been true since pixel 4. it just picks your phone in the background.

          a burner sim, like a literal criminal, is the only way today.

          • asnelt 3 minutes ago
            Even with a burner sim, there is the International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) number, which is tied to the phone, and is known to all apps with the android.permission.READ_PRIVILEGED_PHONE_STATE permission.
          • goodmythical 14 minutes ago
            assuming the number you get hasn't previously been assigned to a google account
      • megagpt1 18 minutes ago
        [dead]
    • juiceland 11 minutes ago
      > Google Account that isn't tied to anything else.

      At the risk of being a privacy absolutist / fatalist: Google’s entire business model is surveillance. They follow you around and track your habits so you can be influenced. Given that, a Google account is always tied to something else.

    • amaccuish 10 minutes ago
      GrapheneOS is focused on absolute security. For those of us on more privacy-oriented ROMs with MicroG, we're very happy with Aurora.
    • SahAssar 30 minutes ago
      Having to have a account is absolutely a downgrade and privacy-hostile.
    • talon8635 23 minutes ago
      Doesn’t Google make it very hard to create an account tied to nothing (no phone or alt email)?
      • armadyl 22 minutes ago
        If you create it on a stock Pixel device the phone requirement gets dropped.
        • talon8635 21 minutes ago
          It’s undoubtedly tied to the phone with is tied to the owner
          • gruez 17 minutes ago
            People report that it works even on grapheneos with sandboxed google play. My guess there's some fingerprinting going on, not necessarily that they're tying the account to some account id.
          • armadyl 20 minutes ago
            Well yeah. But if you care about anonymity on that level there are ways around that (i.e. buying in cash and creating the account using public WiFi).
      • kotaKat 10 minutes ago
        It's the SomethingAwful model: go to the store and find the cheapest Android phone from some prepaid company for :tenbux: then use it to set up your Google account during out-of-box-setup while on the store's free public WiFi (since Google OOBE allows free account creation without a number or existing email), then toss the phone in a drawer afterwards.

        "Hope ya got ten bucks!"

        (I got a random 5G Moto phone for ~$10 on clearance and it was an absolute shitter of a phone full of garbage packed in malware, but after cleaning and debloating as much as I can, it's at least a nifty toy to poke at Termux or something.)

  • skeledrew 29 minutes ago
    I've been stuck with unupdated apps because Aurora hasn't been working for me for a while. A few of them have been nagging me to update. I have everything Google disabled or removed, and no I won't reenable any of it. Also I use anon strictly on Aurora, and no I won't login with my Google account; haven't logged in on a phone for over 8 years now and I have no intention of breaking the streak.
  • troyvit 34 minutes ago
    I use Aurora on GOS. I get that they say sandboxed Play is more secure than Aurora, but I prefer it for its lack of toxicity and absence of shitty dark patterns.

    I think the increased popularity of GOS is going to draw in more users like me who picked it for reasons adjacent to Graphene's original purpose, and I hope it's not too annoying for their community.

    • DaSHacka 18 minutes ago
      I actually think there's already a lot of us in the 'community' as-is. I personally describe it as 'Valuing Privacy/Freedom over Security'. One pretty clear example of this is how they don't recommend using FireFox Mobile and F-Droid, both of which I use regardless because I'm not willing to put up with worse privacy/usability tradeoffs in the name of (imo 'hyper-')security.

      I think it's fine the mission of the project isn't directly aligned with some of us, though I can tell we often get on the core contributor's nerves lol

  • kjander79 46 minutes ago
    I feel the title editorializes a bit too much. The thread only confirms the bug, not a specific cause yet. As sibling comments indicate, the effect on GrapheneOS users is undetermined.
    • aniviacat 11 minutes ago
      For me, the issue also only occurs sometimes. Usually I can download apps like normal.
  • denzen 23 minutes ago
    Using lineageos on an old samsung without any google services, I guess this would impact many "degoogled" users as well
  • CodesInChaos 23 minutes ago
    For me anonymous use of Aurora never really worked, and with a google account it still works.
  • _leom 11 minutes ago
    This happened to me but then got fixed the day later
  • ChocolateGod 19 minutes ago
    So an app that uses an unofficial API broke when that API changed?

    Not news nor "blocking".

  • shevy-java 6 minutes ago
    Google becomes more and more evil by the second now.
  • kotaKat 41 minutes ago
    Didn't Epic get some kind of magic injunction saying that Google had to allow open access to the entire Play Store catalogue or something?
  • ranger_danger 18 minutes ago
    > Aurora uses burner account for anonymous login. looks like their account pool is flagged

    This seems like it was destined to get banned somehow... and I don't think it means that the store itself is blocked, just the pool of accounts they (ab)use.

  • ChrisArchitect 23 minutes ago
    Title is: Aurora Store returns a “&$Server busy, please try again later.” error
  • v1z 36 minutes ago
    Google needs to fuck off
  • erikvanoosten 1 hour ago
    Android distributions that recommend AuroraStore (such as Graphene OS and Sailfish OS) are now mostly blocked by Google Play Store.
    • dxjxjdjsssb 54 minutes ago
      Play store works just fine on GrapheneOS. All of play services run in a sandbox.

      You can install the Play store from the GrapheneOS App Store.

      In fact I'm pretty sure the GrapheneOS folks advise against Aurora Store, etc.

      • himata4113 46 minutes ago
        The entire point is so you don't have to have a google account. Aurora actually works fine if you do sign in. This is just blocking anon downloads.
      • imzadi 47 minutes ago
        Yeah, was confused. I'm on GrapheneOS and don't even know what Aurora is.
        • CodesInChaos 22 minutes ago
          It's an alternative client app for the google store.
    • JoshStrobl 20 minutes ago
      Sailfish OS user on Jolla Phone 2: Aurora is working fine here.

      P.S. Sailfish OS is NOT an Android distribution. It is a proper Linux system and they have their own custom Android runtime (AppSupport) as a layer on top for running Android apps. This runtime _is_ Android under the hood, but is separate from Sailfish itself (has its own native app ecosystem).

    • bushwart 42 minutes ago
      I wasn't aware GOS recommended AuroraStore.
    • savwolf 43 minutes ago
      GOS recommends play store
    • iAMkenough 45 minutes ago
      AuroraStore uses a pool of burner Google Play Store accounts to facilitate anonymous downloads. This is what happens when those burner accounts get flagged.
      • ErenayDev 5 minutes ago
        I'm using my Proton account in my phone and in play store. now i tried adding my proton account in AuroraStore, and it worked flawlessly. so my question: why AuroraStore uses google accounts instead of another providers?
      • ranger_danger 17 minutes ago
        How does one even create a new google account in $current_year without requiring phone verification or worse?