5 comments

  • jahnu 4 hours ago
    One thing worth noting is our popular notion of what a star seems to be is quite different from what astronomers have.

    One example, Canis Majoris has a radius of about 1420 solar radii. But its mass is roughly 17±8 times the mass of the Sun and therefore an average density of 5.33 to 8.38 mg/m3. “It is over 100.000 times less dense than Earth’s atmosphere at sea level.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VY_Canis_Majoris

    https://nineplanets.org/vy-canis-majoris/

    • Sharlin 4 hours ago
      The surface radius of a star is defined based on optical thickness. If you were there, the star would in fact look like a fairly well-defined opaque spheroid with the reported radius. The density of the photosphere plasma is near zero, but there’s a lot of it.
      • brabel 38 minutes ago
        Why doesn’t the stuff just falls in towards the center? It just floats there??
        • zygentoma 29 minutes ago
          Radiation pressure! There is so much heat (= photons) radiating outwards, that it counteracts the gravitational pull.
          • brabel 27 minutes ago
            Wow I knew that stars have that radiation pressure but had no idea it caused mass to get so crazy far away from the ignited area of the star!
            • Sharlin 7 minutes ago
              These giant stars burn so very very bright. And correspondingly only live a few tens of millions years at most.
    • FranOntanaya 4 hours ago
      I always wonder when do they stop considering the outer layers part of the star and not relatively dense solar wind soup. Nobody says Earth has 7000km radius, even tho there's traces of exosphere past 500km.
      • antognini 3 hours ago
        The outer boundary is the point where a photon has a ~50% chance of escaping without encountering another particle.
        • encrypted_bird 55 minutes ago
          Do you have a source? I'd love to read more. :)
    • usrnm 4 hours ago
      My layman definition of what a star is is "it's somewhere in the sky and it gives off light". The word "density" wouldn't even come to my mind
    • margalabargala 2 hours ago
      > therefore an average density of 5.33 to 8.38 mg/m3

      That's nuts. How on earth does fusion happen at that density? Is there a denser core that actually fuses, and the outer fluffy bits just glow from the inner heat?

      • adrianN 2 hours ago
        Averages are quite misleading. The core is obviously a lot denser. Our sun has an average energy output per cubic meter that is comparable to a compost heap.
        • throwaway89864 2 hours ago
          Astra says this claim is misleading. Sun's average energy output per cubic meter is three orders of magnitude smaller than that of a compost heap. The fusion core is comparable though.
          • malfist 46 minutes ago
            Of course it's misleading, thats the point GP was trying to make. Averages belie truth in large, diverse systems with extremes
          • Retric 1 hour ago
            The energy density of specific compost heaps varies by several orders of magnitude it’s not a single number. Volume, moisture content, internal temperature, external temperature, materials being composted, etc all play a significant role.
        • margalabargala 2 hours ago
          Sure, but now I'm left wondering what the size of the body doing fusion is. If most of the star is glorified glowing atmosphere, I want to know the mass and radius of the fusing bits.
          • peri-cl 1 hour ago
            There's dedicated Wikipedia articles responsive to this,

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_core

          • idiotsecant 1 hour ago
            Depends on the class of the star. Our sun? About 1/4 radius and in is fusion reaction. But it gets weird in other stars. In red giants the fusion zone is a very small shell around a dead core. Maybe something like earths orbit in radius, but very very thin.
    • dpriddle 4 hours ago
      Yes and no. It’s fluffy on the outside, but at the core it’s likely denser than our sun.
    • lrasinen 2 hours ago
      Average density for non-uniform objects is pretty useless, since the cubic volume scaling makes a mess of things.

      As an example, I pulled the stats for an electric locomotive. 19x3x4.4 meters, mass 90 metric tonnes. That's an average density of about 1/3rd of water.

    • peri-cl 1 hour ago
      These objects (black hole stars) seem to be far larger than that,

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-star#Formation_and_prope... (Caption: "Size comparison of a hypothetical quasi-star to some of the largest known stars")

  • benji-york 3 hours ago
    Any decent human being would have called these Black Hole Suns.
    • vardump 2 hours ago
      I just twisted my mouth sides upwards with my fingers to form a smile in agreement.
  • JumpCrisscross 3 hours ago
    Is there an experiment that could resolve this? Literally resolve these objects better, or otherwise distinguish between these hypotheses?

    Is there anything behind these objects they could lens?

  • ck2 3 hours ago
  • debo_ 5 hours ago
    Soundgarden was apparently prophetic with their hit song "Black Hole Sun."
    • TimeBearingDown 4 hours ago
      May Chris Cornell rest in peace. He should have seen this.